Monday 31 December 2012

The lord of universe do exists who has created all including us,when matter and things are there ,there should be a creator and we named it as God.God is not a property of any religion,God is our faith and above all the humanity and creation.Religion is different,religion is a path to reach god. So there should be no confusion or fights. God is one but we call HIM with different names as in humans a person may have different names as mother may call her son with different name,father with another loving name friends may call with different names so we have different names for one God. That's all. But the question is this the way things are supposed to be? When God is perfect and never does bad,never touches bad.Then why there are so  many problem which humanity is facing,greed,hatred,ego or terrorism.
We are told that God is: Omnipotent, but he's not, he's better than that, he only uses his power for Good.
We are told that God is:Omniscient, but he's not, he's better than that, he lets us choose. (Free-Will)
We are told that God is:Omnipresent, but he's not, he's better than that.
 Medicine tries to repair and prevent, Law tries to control and correct, Religion and Philosophy try to explain, and much of Science tries to repair, but still there are evils,who spread terror and common man suffer.
 No. this is not the way things are supposed to be. Please consider this: For a law to be a law it can have no exceptions, in fact, that is what makes it a law. Similarly, for a complete explanation to be truly complete it must cover all possible aspects, or it is in fact not a complete explanation.  To say that God permits wickedness so as to allow persons to choose to serve him might satisfy some. But frankly, many have chosen to serve God and still suffer and experience wickedness.While some never believe in existence of  God and yet sometimes prosper greatly. And when a two-week old infant suffers horribly and dies of cancer, please, tell me how that child benefits from suffering. In fact, wickedness is not here for anyone's benefit. It is a horrible thing that God is forced to deal with, and HE will deal with it well. But it is not something he chose.

We know god from different sources,our understanding of facts or truths which are based on experiences called methodology and knowledge from introspection,axioms or self evidence, So our knowledge is in psychophysical state. Confusions or disagreements are not on the existence of god but on the proofs,truth or knowledge which is variable from one experience to another and from one person to another,different person have different thoughts and perceptions. Introspection or enlightenment experiences are also different. So logic,evidences subjective experiences concerning the quality of existence or evidence for subjective reality are yet to decide. Whether an object of mind is accepted for existence or whether it can ne accepted or justified?

The truth about God should elevate your view of him. Do you think that:1. God is limited (in a good way) Or 2. God is a victim or 3. God is on trial. Actually  God does not permit wickedness,but it is forced on him against his will.The truth about God should elevate your view of him.
The concept of Aum, may suit scientific minds better. For, it conforms to the three postulates of physics: Beginning from a singularity, Spontaneity and Chaos. The Vedantic concept acknowledges the existence of one and only primordial source — the boundary-less singularity, with no beginning or end — which remains the efficient and material cause of creation. In unmanifest state, it is perceived as being without form or perceptible attribute, but not without content. Evidently, such a state could be possible within the energy 
framework alone, so the primordial source is something of an energy-whole
The laws of physics may be able to partly explain the cosmos. But, so far, physics has not been able to establish a correlation between the primal source and man. Science fails to establish a continuum between the source and the manifest in practical terms. Arguments for and against the existence of God have been proposed by philosophers, theologians, scientists, and others for thousands of years. In philosophical terms, such arguments involve primarily the disciplines of epistemology (the nature and scope of knowledge) and ontology(study of the nature of being,reality and  existence and  also the theory of value, since concepts of perfection are connected to notions of God. A wide variety of arguments exist which can be categorized as metaphysical,logical,empirical or subjective. The existence of God is subject to lively debate in philosophy, the philosophy of religion and popular culture.

No comments:

Post a Comment