When someone is wrong about something, is it always necessary to inform them of it? Does it not depend on various other considerations such as 'how much danger they are putting themselves or anyone else in?' Or, 'how offended are they going to feel if an error on their part is publicly drawn to their attention?' There may be many perfectly good reasons why people allow other people to remain in ignorance. And now we come to your own opinion about a sensitive situation. Consider your obligations. Saturday, 9 August 2014
When someone is wrong about something, is it always necessary to inform them of it? Does it not depend on various other considerations such as 'how much danger they are putting themselves or anyone else in?' Or, 'how offended are they going to feel if an error on their part is publicly drawn to their attention?' There may be many perfectly good reasons why people allow other people to remain in ignorance. And now we come to your own opinion about a sensitive situation. Consider your obligations.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
-
To sort out solutions first we have to identify what our problems are? Pliny the Elder's fine book on natural history contained one u...
-
Why run if you can walk? Why walk if you can amble? Why amble if you can just sit down and wait until your needs are naturally met? The...
No comments:
Post a Comment